Non-reading activities need your help too!
-
annise
- LibriVox Admin Team
- Posts: 34227
- Joined: April 3rd, 2008, 3:55 am
- Location: Melbourne,Australia
Post
by annise » October 31st, 2015, 1:17 am
They would still require research - it doesn't mean they are PD in the USA.
I'd prefer the resources listed in the wiki were PD for LV.
Anne
-
MaryAnnSpiegel
- LibriVox Admin Team
- Posts: 16983
- Joined: February 23rd, 2009, 4:37 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
Post
by MaryAnnSpiegel » October 31st, 2015, 6:47 am
The BL says they are from books published in the 17, 18 and 19th centuries. That puts all of them before 1900.
I guess I am missing how they could [not] be PD in the US . . .
MaryAnn
Join us to
MARCH to the finish line by completing as many projects as we can during March!
This thread tracks our progress and lists projects in need of readers/PLers.
My Librivox solos
-
RossKlatte
- Posts: 359
- Joined: February 3rd, 2016, 12:29 pm
- Location: Roebuck, South Carolina
Post
by RossKlatte » March 8th, 2016, 4:52 pm
The Film Noir movies are dated 1939, 1950, 1954, and so forth.
Why are they Public Domain?
RossKlatte
-
Availle
- LibriVox Admin Team
- Posts: 19555
- Joined: August 1st, 2009, 11:30 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Availle » March 8th, 2016, 5:21 pm
Because the BRITISH library obviously adheres to European copyright, which extends to authors/translators death + 70 years; or sometimes depending on the publication, publication date + 70 years. I think films are protected for 50 years after their first public screening only, but I am not sure.
-
carolb
- Posts: 2035
- Joined: March 1st, 2011, 2:19 pm
- Location: West Sussex, England
Post
by carolb » March 9th, 2016, 1:40 am
It works both ways Ann,
We Europeans have to check that whatever is in the wiki and PD for LV is also PD for us.
A little research never did anyone any harm.
Of course, there are still hundreds of thousands of images in the British Library Archives that are PD for LV
Carol
-
carteki
- Posts: 1634
- Joined: January 10th, 2015, 9:56 am
Post
by carteki » March 12th, 2016, 11:44 am
MaryAnnSpiegel wrote:The BL says they are from books published in the 17, 18 and 19th centuries. That puts all of them before 1900.
I guess I am missing how they could [not] be PD in the US . . .
MaryAnn
If any copywrite owner puts a book/song/... in the public domain, then it really shouldn't matter where the jurisdiction is. The argument about jurisdiction is only where law DEEMS the work to be in the public domain. There is stuff that is created right now that is in the public domain.